<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Visualizing the State of the Product &#8211; Build Calendars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamkwhite.com/2009/05/30/visualizing-the-state-of-the-product-build-calendars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamkwhite.com/2009/05/30/visualizing-the-state-of-the-product-build-calendars/</link>
	<description>Leadership, Management and Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:25:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Swanson</title>
		<link>http://www.adamkwhite.com/2009/05/30/visualizing-the-state-of-the-product-build-calendars/comment-page-1/#comment-7324</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Swanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamkwhite.com/?p=184#comment-7324</guid>
		<description>Hey Adam,

I would be careful not to use these graphics in a unscrupulous manner.

I noticed that my eyes are quickly drawn to the Red Xs and focus on them much more than the green check marks. This effect might result in over stating the problem, for example I think the graphic would look negative even with only one red X. 

This effect could also be used to your advantage if you did want to emphasize the problem more. For example you could increase the size and the brightness of the Xs slightly and reduce the size and brightness of the check marks resulting in greater attention to the Xs.

I just thought how I interpreted the information based on the colour to be interesting. I wonder what would happen if you made the Xs blue and kept the check marks green, would the graphic be as powerful message against bad builds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Adam,</p>
<p>I would be careful not to use these graphics in a unscrupulous manner.</p>
<p>I noticed that my eyes are quickly drawn to the Red Xs and focus on them much more than the green check marks. This effect might result in over stating the problem, for example I think the graphic would look negative even with only one red X. </p>
<p>This effect could also be used to your advantage if you did want to emphasize the problem more. For example you could increase the size and the brightness of the Xs slightly and reduce the size and brightness of the check marks resulting in greater attention to the Xs.</p>
<p>I just thought how I interpreted the information based on the colour to be interesting. I wonder what would happen if you made the Xs blue and kept the check marks green, would the graphic be as powerful message against bad builds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam White</title>
		<link>http://www.adamkwhite.com/2009/05/30/visualizing-the-state-of-the-product-build-calendars/comment-page-1/#comment-7242</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamkwhite.com/?p=184#comment-7242</guid>
		<description>Eric,

This is only meant to show if the build process was successful in getting us something that we can use.

It doesn&#039;t show the state of any testing.

I will however post my take on a simplified testing dashboard in a later post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>This is only meant to show if the build process was successful in getting us something that we can use.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t show the state of any testing.</p>
<p>I will however post my take on a simplified testing dashboard in a later post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Jacobson</title>
		<link>http://www.adamkwhite.com/2009/05/30/visualizing-the-state-of-the-product-build-calendars/comment-page-1/#comment-7241</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Jacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamkwhite.com/?p=184#comment-7241</guid>
		<description>Yeah!  This is awesome.  It&#039;s like a super simple version of James Bach&#039;s White Board Dashboard.  I want to do something like this.  I just can&#039;t figure out how to encapsulate a days worth of testing into a pass/fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah!  This is awesome.  It&#8217;s like a super simple version of James Bach&#8217;s White Board Dashboard.  I want to do something like this.  I just can&#8217;t figure out how to encapsulate a days worth of testing into a pass/fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carsten</title>
		<link>http://www.adamkwhite.com/2009/05/30/visualizing-the-state-of-the-product-build-calendars/comment-page-1/#comment-7227</link>
		<dc:creator>Carsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamkwhite.com/?p=184#comment-7227</guid>
		<description>Obviously they are worn out on Fridays and not yet awake on Mondays ;-)

Builds should not be made on those days.. haha..

You&#039;re right: the pictorial way is much more informative and easier to connect to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously they are worn out on Fridays and not yet awake on Mondays <img src='http://www.adamkwhite.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Builds should not be made on those days.. haha..</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right: the pictorial way is much more informative and easier to connect to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
